Join us online and call us on the radio.
If you miss us on the radio, you can catch our best sports and news interviews anytime right here. Just click the image on the right to visit our audio vault.
09
Jun
|
Written by The Maverick
|
|
Monday, 09 June 2008 |
The Witch is dead. Well, politically anyway. And probably not for long. Hillary Clinton, finally and at long last, before she was yanked off the stage by a
Broadway Hook wielded by her own Party - suspended/conceded/endorsed over the weekend,
depending on your definition of those terms (she remains insistant on retaining her delegates). In addition, although the actual word was never uttered, by suspending she has in fact conceded the Democratic nomination to Barack Obama (remember him?). And she did actually state publicly to her adoring crowd that she is endorsing Obama, and urged her supporters to “support him with as much energy and commitment as you did for me”.This will be no small feat, which Hillary Clinton knows better than anyone.
Of course, it might have been just a bit of an easier
transition for everyone had she suspended/conceded/endorsed, say, last Tuesday
when she was mathematically eliminated from contention. Or, better yet, after the Indiana
and North Carolina primaries a
month ago, which removed any real doubt about Obama’s (to borrow a Clinton
phrase) “inevitability”. Of course, most
of us who have observed/supported/tolerated the Clintons
over the years realize that a gesture so magnanimous/selfless/classy is
completely out of political character for them. They have seldom demonstrated any loyalty for the basic principles
and goals of the rank-and-file of the
Democratic Party.
As mentioned in a previous post, Bill Clinton was singularly
responsible for ramming the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) down
the throats of Congress and the American people. His legislative cave-in to the
telecommunications industry in 1996 opened the floodgates for the concentration
of media ownership in fewer and fewer hands that ensued. He also was responsible for gutting the
nominations of Attorney General candidates Zoe Baird, Kimba Wood, as well as
throwing Lani Guanier under the bus.
To
Bill and Hillary Clinton, election campaigns in general, and presidential
campaigns in particular, are first, last, and always about themselves and their
personal political agendas. Why else
drag the party/voters/country through what essentially was a very expensive
farewell tour? Why keep hammering on the
popular vote of some 18 million people as if you were John L. Lewis delivering
the support of his United Mine Workers? It
can’t be to influence Obama’s political agenda, since there is little
difference in their policy positions on any of the major issues such as health
care, Iraq, and
the economy. Even the short-term
leverage of financial assistance to reduce her massive campaign debt ($30
million) doesn’t explain everything, in my view. Although this has yet to be
played out, I guess I just don’t trust
the Clintons anymore.
Why am I so suspicious of their motives? In a
single word: tradition.
The Maverick
|
|